The
Asian Football Confederation's (AFC) recent decisions regarding Mohun Bagan and
Al Nassr have raised concerns about bias in the organization's decision-making
process. Mohun Bagan was expelled from the AFC Champions League 2 for failing
to turn up for an away fixture in Iran, while Al Nassr's appeal was granted,
allowing them to play their match against Esteghlal at a neutral venue
🇮🇳 Mohun Bagan Super Giant considered to have withdrawn from #ACLTwo after failure to report to Tabriz for Group A fixture against Tractor FC on October 2.https://t.co/gPXaeOmmgE
Mohun Bagan was expelled from the AFC Champions League 2
after failing to travel to Iran for a match. The AFC deemed this a withdrawal
from the competition, resulting in the team's expulsion
Al Nassr's Appeal
In contrast, Al Nassr's appeal was granted, allowing them
to play their match against Esteghlal at a neutral venue. This decision has
raised questions about the AFC's consistency in applying its rules and
regulations.
Comparison and
Criticism
The AFC's decisions have been criticized for being biased
towards Al Nassr, with some arguing that the organization is favoring the Saudi
Arabian club. The fact that Mohun Bagan
was expelled for a similar issue, while Al Nassr's appeal was granted, has
raised concerns about the AFC's impartiality.
the AFC's decisions regarding Mohun Bagan
and Al Nassr have sparked controversy and raised questions about bias in the
organization's decision-making process. While Mohun Bagan was expelled for
failing to turn up for a match in Iran, with ongoing tension between Israel and iran, but Al Nassr's appeal was granted, allowing
them to play at a neutral venue. The AFC's consistency and impartiality in
applying its rules and regulations have been called into question, these has been happening for a while as KSA clubs have been getting away with a slap on the wrist other clubs are questioned intensively!
0 Comments